Business case

Measure what repeated business questions
cost your team.

Size the analyst time, rework, and decision delay using your own baseline — then test one recurring workflow. This is a business case built on how the product works and the numbers you already have, not a spreadsheet of savings we invented for you.

See the interpretation. Approve the plan. Inspect what runs.

What to measure

Three numbers you can move — and baseline today.

Each maps to a specific behavior of the product and to a metric you already have or can measure this quarter. No slogans, no assumed savings.

01

Decide sooner

Measure question-to-accepted-answer time.

Spotonix interprets a question into a plan you approve before SQL runs, so fewer wrong-answer round-trips stand between the question and a number the team trusts. Baseline the time from “someone asks” to “the team accepts the answer,” and watch that window close.

02

Create capacity

Measure analyst hours spent re-answering recurring questions.

Where an accepted plan is persisted and retrieved, the next person asking the same question can start from settled meaning instead of re-deriving it. Baseline the hours analysts spend rebuilding Segments and Calculations that already existed.

03

Strengthen control

Measure rework, definition disputes, and review cycles.

Governed from intent through execution, deployed in your environment with existing permissions preserved. Baseline how often a number gets reconciled, a definition gets disputed, or a review sends work back — the “numbers war” that rarely lands on anyone’s budget.

Size it using your numbers

Build the number on your own inputs.

We're not going to hand you a payback period we made up. The value is real, but it's yours to size. Here are the levers that move it — put your figures in.

Your input Where the value comes from
Analysts fielding the queue your headcount

Sets the size of the team whose time reuse gives back.

Loaded cost per analyst your finance figure

Converts reclaimed hours into dollars you can defend.

Time spent re-deriving existing logic your estimate

The share reuse and accepted plans take back directly.

Questions that recur each quarter your count

How often an accepted Answer can be reused instead of rebuilt.

Decisions that slip while waiting your call

The soft cost of the window that closes before the answer lands.

Reclaimed re-derivation time × loaded cost is the hard number you can bring to finance. Shorter question-to-answer time, and — where accepted plans are persisted and retrieved — reused Answers, compound quarter over quarter. Fewer definition disputes shows up as trust, not a line item — real, and harder to price.

Bring these to a scoped pilot and measure them against your current baseline — your numbers, not ours.

Prove it

Prove it on one recurring workflow.

The honest way to test a business case is on a scoped, time-boxed pilot with a baseline and acceptance criteria you set up front — against your own numbers.

  1. 1

    Pick one recurring workflow

    One high-value recurring question your team owns — retention drivers, margin leakage, service levels.

  2. 2

    Baseline it today

    Capture the current question-to-accepted-answer time, the re-derivation hours, and the rework and definition disputes — before you change anything.

  3. 3

    Set acceptance criteria

    Agree up front what “better” means — faster to an accepted answer, fewer rebuilds, fewer disputes — so the result is a decision, not another debate.

  4. 4

    Run it plan-first, alongside your stack

    Questions become visible plans you approve; where accepted plans are persisted and retrieved, the next person starts from settled meaning. Runs alongside Tableau, Looker, or Power BI, in your environment, with existing permissions.

Size it on one decision loop.

Bring a recurring question and your own baseline. We'll help you measure what interpreting-before-querying is worth to your team.